People who hover about the fashion industry – writers, buyers, and hangers-on – tend to be larger-than-life characters, for whom drawing attention to themselves is part of the game.  The runway shows and seasonal trends are merely backdrops for their own fluttery, fashionable selves.  Andre Leon Talley, Polly Mellon, and Diana Vreeland all fit the bill.  For a long time I thought of Suzy Menkes, the longtime fashion editor of the the International Herald Tribune who now contributes to the Times, this same way, as a sort of English Anna Piaggi.  She bubbles over when she talks, and sports a little back pompadour like Olive Oyl’s.

But after reading her recent appreciation of Haider Ackermann, whose work she says is “just fine materials slipping over the body,” I was bowled over.  All at once she expresses the excitement of discovering an unorthodox new designer, pinpoints his position within the industry, and captures the elemental power of the clothes.  Read this passage, which teeters on the brink of parody but stands, somehow, as well-informed criticism: “I thought that there was a mournful note to the work, like the call of the muezzin to prayer. Yet the clothes were not sad, although they were often dark, in the way of anthracite storm clouds, a midnight sky or a puddle on a night road."  There’s something that happens when a skillful writer writes about something that she cares about deeply – her language heats up and goes a bit overboard.  It’s a kind of love.

As it is with life, it is with museums.  Running from one important exhibit to the next I stumbled upon something infinitely more engaging.  In a first floor hallway, stretched between gift stalls, a temporary installation of modern artworks that take their inspiration from African masks.  There are the predictable pieces – like Man Ray’s “Noire et Blanche” – and there is the work of two amazing contemporary sculptors from Benin, Romauld Hazoume and Calixte Dakpogan.  Both men make mixed media assemblages from found objects.

Dakpogan’s work is a more abstract and lyrical – and rather loosely tied to notions of the mask.  Hazoume’s work is more mask-like, more political, and more linked to traditional West African forms.  Many of his pieces at the Met, like the one above, make use of the plastic jerrycans used to carry gasoline, illegally, into Benin from Nigeria, and then left there to litter streets.  If the political overtones aren’t immediately apparent to an American viewer, their artfulness is.  The masks have an astute visual wit.  Who except Picasso would look into the bottom of a stained plastic jug and see a face?  With some slits and some cowrie shells the sculpture is complete.  I remember an art history professor in college explaining that Picasso wasn’t interested in African sculpture because he was interested in Africa, but because he saw in it an explosive formal freedom.  That freedom is still there.

I saw U2 twice, once in high school when they were touring for “The Unforgettable Fire,” and then again a few years ago at Madison Square Garden, when they were touring for “How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb."  In between I did not pay attention.  Then last weekend, while out with high school friends at an Irish bar, I spotted a U2 poster on the wall and it sent me back, reeling, wanting to fill in the missing years.

Between "Fire” and “Bomb” U2 were practicing astounding stagecraft.  Looking at clips from the 1997 “Pop Mart” tour, I barely recognize the band or the boys.  They arrived on stage in a lemon-shaped disco ball and performed beneath a giant LED curtain, framed by a single Golden Arch.  And they wore costumes designed for them by the most fevered and irreverent of the Antwerp Six, Walter Van Beirendonck.  It’s a bit like the avant-garde schtick Lady Gaga is doing now.  The CD they were touring for, “Pop,” isn’t great, but the costumes are undeniably super-great.  Edge is dressed as a space cowboy, Bono as a prizefighter, a cartoon superhero, and the Unabomber, and Larry, who seems less enthusiastic about the whole business, in embellished black tees.  But it’s Adam whom the outre costumes serve best.  He’s dressed in flashified work uniforms: a dotted orange Hazmat jumper, camouflage suits, hard hats, and face masks.  I can’t believe I missed the spectacle of it all.

Ten years after the World Trade Center (WTC) attacks, we’re still waiting to see what the site will be.  The city has done some powerful PR to make up for the sluggish construction.  There’s a glossy website, WTCProgress, and detailed previews (here and here) of the memorial, which is scheduled to open on September 11.  And the twelve-foot-high scaffolding around the main blocks shows images of steel workers in Iwo Jima-like poses, and renderings of the new Santiago Calatrava-designed subway station and the SOM-designed office tower One WTC (formerly the “Freedom Tower”), which tourists are taking as the backdrop for portraits.

What strikes me most powerfully now is how empty the central block feels, where the Twin Towers once stood and where the new memorial and museum will be.  In addition to being very, very tall, the Towers obstructed views for pedestrians from just about every direction, creating a not-unpleasant sense of urban congestion.  (One of the saddest facts of post-9/11 downtown was the new, clear views of Cesar Pelli’s World Financial Center.)  The WTC block is a central one and an immense one and it will be entirely flat, since the memorials carve water-filled pits at the footprints of the old buildings.  The winning design is called “Reflecting Absence,” but is this too big of an absence?  And does the site call for an absence?  Surrounding the pools, in place of the endless, hyper-modern plaza of white travertine, will be rows of white swamp oaks.  When I was in architecture school we drew rows of trees in site plans to fill spaces we had no specific ideas about; it was a little drafting trick.  I doubt that rows of trees will be enough to fill this block.  Not after the expressive, naturalistic, season-sensitive plantings at the Highline.  And not at a site so dear to so many.