Nalina Moses

ARCHITECT, WRITER, CURATOR

  • BLOG
  • SINGLE-HANDEDLY
  • WRITINGS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • CV
  • CONTACT
LAST YEAR’S MODEL
It’s sad that Hindustan Motors is no longer producing Amassadors, the hefty, bubble-topped sedans that were, in the 60’s and the 70’s, basically, the only car on the road in India.  The car is iconic, and st…

LAST YEAR’S MODEL

It’s sad that Hindustan Motors is no longer producing Amassadors, the hefty, bubble-topped sedans that were, in the 60’s and the 70’s, basically, the only car on the road in India.  The car is iconic, and stood for middle class India the same way the Beetle stood for 60’s America, and the Trabant for postwar East Berlin. Virtually all Ambassadors were painted the same color, a chalky grey-white, and personalized with garlands and trinkets, often religious, dangling in the front and back window.  Back then not every family of means had a car.  Those who did had an Ambassador and, along with it, a dedicated driver who tended to it as if it were a living thing: washing it down each morning before it hit the road, keeping it perpetually fueled and oiled, and, often, sleeping in the back seat at night.

My father’s family in Trivandrum had an Ambassador, and each time we visited as children we met our grandfather waiting outside the airport standing beside the car with the driver.  Three generations piled into it, like a clown car, and our enormous pigeon blue hardside suitcases were stacked in the boot and on the roof.  The car didn’t have air conditioning so the windows were perpetually rolled-down, though the ones in back could only go half-way.  The driver was cautious but, to accommodate two others in the passenger seat, drove with his head, right arm, and shoulders out the window.  The seats, upholstered in a thin vinyl, were springy, so we bounced around with every dip and turn in the road.

The Ambassador dominated the market because it was a strong, flexible car, and because it was one of the few cars available.  Importing a foreign car at that time required considerable wealth and influence; it was an opulence.  Today, with more liberalized trade policies, the market is flooded with foreign cars.  More and more Indians have more and more money, and want a different kind of ride.  The best-selling cars in the country last year have the same big, glossy, Transformer-type stylings as the minivans and suburbans that can be spotted on the road in any American suburb.  And in the past five years Bentley, Lamborghini and Ferrari have all opened showrooms in India.

It’s telling that Indians, who have a passion for over-embellishment, were happy for so long with the dowdy white Ambassador.  Why didn’t Hindustan Motors introduce the car in fuchsia, saffron, and electric green, or plaids and paisleys?  Decades ago India wasn’t a materialistic culture, and it wasn’t an individualistic culture either.  Just having a car and driver – which freed one from walking long distances, riding teeming buses, and hauling packages – was a luxury.  Car owners were less interested in exhibiting their wealth or asserting their individuality than in convenience.  Maybe I’m less unsettled about the loss of this car than the loss of that India.

Photograph courtesy of Scoop Whoop.

July 04, 2014 by Nalina Moses
July 04, 2014 /Nalina Moses /Source
AUTOMOBILES, Hindustan Motors, Ambassador, India
Comment
As I stepped out of Grand Central Station yesterday I saw one of the city’s new prototype taxis — a Taxi of Tomorrow — roll by, carrying passengers west on Forty-Second Street. This new taxi design is part of Mayor Bloomberg’s scheme to standa…

As I stepped out of Grand Central Station yesterday I saw one of the city’s new prototype taxis — a Taxi of Tomorrow — roll by, carrying passengers west on Forty-Second Street. This new taxi design is part of Mayor Bloomberg’s scheme to standardize the city’s fleet. His opponents have noted that the vehicle is not hybrid and not handicapped accessible, and that city hall doesn’t have authority over the Taxi and Limousine Commission to specify what vehicles they use. What’s critical to the entire project but never really discussed is the new taxi’s image. The Taxi of Tomorrow is a big boxy tangerine-colored van. More than a machine of deisel and steel, it looks like a mobile storage shed. Stopped on Forty-Second Street behind a red light, squeezed between city buses and black towncars, the taxi looked ungainly.

Of course there’s nothing essentially glamorous about the Nissan sedans that make up the bulk of the taxi fleet now.  But at least they look like cars, like instruments of motion, with a compact low-to-the-ground profile.  These vehicles offer independence from the sidewalks and the subways, and they offer transport, both literal and imaginative, to some other place: to a party, to a job interview, to a rendezvous, to a mysterious unexplored corner of the city.  The Taxi of Tomorrow has a sadly utilitarian profile.  Rather than speed or transport, it offers space inside for stretching and storage, though not enough, apparently, to accommodate a wheelchair. From the outside the van looks like a beast of burden, a mule with which to cart old furniture to the dump, to shop for groceries, or to take small children to school.  These vehicles need to be useful, but they also need a little panache.  Why should our taxis, such an integral part of city life, be clunkers like this? For anyone who has, late at night, after dinner and drinks, hailed a cab in a half-dream state, and hurtled down Park Avenue, when there’s no traffic and noise, through the dazzle of light thrown from empty glass towers, a cab feels like a chariot.  Why can’t a cab look like one too?

Photograph by Nalina Moses.

November 23, 2013 by Nalina Moses
November 23, 2013 /Nalina Moses
AUTOMOBILES, New York City, taxi, Taxi of Tomorrow, Mayor Bloomberg, Taxi and Limousine Commission, Nissan, yellow cab, cab
Comment